Manual work, repeated
Steps a person redoes on every project, the same way, from memory. Each repetition is another chance for the error nobody catches until it's already in a drawing set.
Digital-systems studio · Iran · working remotely
Custom Revit content, digital tools, and office automation for architecture, structural, and MEP teams, built from your process, never off a shelf.
01, Where the time goes
Our time goes to three places: work still done by hand, data scattered across sources, and software that doesn't talk to itself. That's where the right system does the most.
Steps a person redoes on every project, the same way, from memory. Each repetition is another chance for the error nobody catches until it's already in a drawing set.
Quantities, statuses, and decisions scattered across files, people, and software. Nothing whole enough to decide from without someone rebuilding it by hand first.
Each one is fine on its own. Together they never become one traceable flow from request to execution to report, so the seams stay manual, and invisible.
02, Products
Whichever one you start from, the first step is the same: understand the problem in full.
A family that isn't just well-drawn, it behaves correctly inside a real model, under real project conditions.
Fewer clicks, fewer errors, more focus on the work that matters. Every tool is studied against how the team actually works before development starts.
One controlled flow from request to execution to reporting. Automation moves things; control stays with the team.
03, See it run
Both of these were built for a specific conversion problem a team was doing by hand. Nothing here is a mockup, these are screen recordings of the tools running.
Instead of a team tracing linework by hand, the tool reads the plan set and creates native Revit elements from it, walls placed on their real wall types, floors, levels, and openings, so the model starts from the drawing rather than from someone's interpretation of it.
Recordings are silent and play without sound.
The model is built live in Revit's isometric 3D view while the tool reports its own progress: elements processed, beams, columns and braces created, non-master members, and, the line that matters most, what was not created. Anything that didn't convert is visible on screen instead of silently missing.
Recordings are silent and play without sound.
04, Process
Four stages. The first two are where most of the risk gets removed.
We watch the real workflow, not the documented one. What's actually done by hand, by whom, and how often it goes wrong.
The problem gets stated in full, with a success measure that can be tested, before any tool is proposed.
Built against your standards and your users. Every added layer of complexity has to earn its place.
Systems are built to change shape as your work grows, so the tool doesn't become the next thing to work around.
05, Research & development
New technology only enters a product once the problem, the data, and the success measure are clear and testable. Staged prototyping surfaces what works, what needs to change, and what shouldn't be built at all, before full investment happens.
How R&D works06, Capabilities
The technical surface behind the three product paths.
07, Insights
No listicles. Each one comes out of a decision we had to make on a real project.
The most dangerous problem in a plugin development partnership rarely comes from a weak portfolio. It comes from the small detail nobody checked during evaluation.
A graph that runs once on its author's model is an experiment. The work that turns it into a tool is the part nobody sees on the canvas.
The ceiling on what's worth automating is usually untested, not real.
08, Questions
No. If what you want is an off-the-shelf template or a generic plugin installed without any process review, we're the wrong studio, and we'll say so rather than take the work. Every project starts from the problem, not a pre-built product.
We're based in Iran and work remotely with architecture, structural, and MEP teams. Remote is how we normally work, not an exception we make.
By workflow complexity, integration needs, and how many people will use it, not by a flat price list. A plugin that looks like one button is priced by the weeks of decisions standing behind that button.
Yes, and often that's the right move. A staged prototype tests the idea, the data, and the success measure before full investment, including the possibility that the thing shouldn't be built.
Both. This site ships in Persian and English at matching URLs, and projects run in whichever language your team works in.
We go through the workflow you want to change: what's done by hand today, where the data lives, what a good outcome would actually look like, and whether a tool is even the right answer.
09, Start
Bring the workflow, not the spec. If a tool is the wrong answer, we'd rather tell you that in the first conversation than at the end of a build.
We are not a fit if you want an off-the-shelf template or a generic plugin installed without a process review.